Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://repositorio.usj.es/handle/123456789/626

Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Pinillos, Felipe-
dc.contributor.authorJaén-Carrillo, Diego-
dc.contributor.authorLatorre-Román, Pedro Á.-
dc.contributor.authorEscalona-Marfil, Carles-
dc.contributor.authorSoto-Hermoso, Víctor M.-
dc.contributor.authorLago-Fuentes, Carlos-
dc.contributor.authorPueyo-Villa, Silvia-
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-13T10:01:39Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-13T10:01:39Z-
dc.date.issued2021-03-02-
dc.identifier.citationGarcía-Pinillos, F.; Jaén-Carrillo, D.; Latorre-Román, P.Á.; Escalona-Marfil, C.; Soto-Hermoso, V.M.; Lago-Fuentes, C.; Pueyo-Villa, S.; Domínguez-Azpíroz, I.; Roche-Seruendo, L.E. Does Arch Stiffness Influence Running Spatiotemporal Parameters? An Analysis of the Relationship between Influencing Factors on Running Performance. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 2437. https:// doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052437es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1660-4601es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.usj.es/handle/123456789/626-
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to determine the influence of arch stiffness on running spatiotemporal parameters at a common speed for a wide range of endurance runners (i.e., 12 km.h−1). In total, 97 runners, 52 men and 45 women, completed a treadmill running protocol at 12 km.h−1. Spatiotemporal parameters were measured using the OptoGait system, and foot structure was assessed by determining arch stiffness. Since between-sex differences were found in anthropometric and foot structure variables, data analysis was conducted separately for men and women, and body mass and height were considered as covariates. For both sexes, a k-means cluster analysis grouped participants according to arch stiffness, by obtaining a group of low-arch stiffness (LAS group) and a group of high-arch stiffness (HAS group), with significant differences in arch stiffness (p < 0.001, for both men and women). No significant differences between LAS and HAS groups were found in running spatiotemporal parameters, regardless of sex (p ≥ 0.05). For both sexes, the partial correlation analysis reported no significant correlations (p ≥ 0.05) between foot structure variables and running spatiotemporal parameters. The results obtained show no differences in spatiotemporal gait characteristics during running at submaximal velocity between runners with low-arch stiffness and those with high-arch stiffness, regardless of sex. These findings may have important implications for clinicians and coaches by adding more evidence to the debate about the use of static foot classification measures when characterizing the foot and its biomechanics during running.es_ES
dc.format.extent9es_ES
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.relation.requiresAdobees_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectArch heightes_ES
dc.subjectArch mobilityes_ES
dc.subjectEndurance runnerses_ES
dc.subjectFootes_ES
dc.subjectSpring-mass modeles_ES
dc.titleDoes Arch Stiffness Influence Running Spatiotemporal Parameters? An Analysis of the Relationship between Influencing Factors on Running Performancees_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/5/2437es_ES
dc.identifier.publicationfirstpage1es_ES
dc.identifier.publicationlastpage9es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ijerph18052437es_ES
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
Aparece en las colecciones: Artículos de revistas



Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons