Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://repositorio.usj.es/handle/123456789/902

Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorJaen-Carrillo, Diego-
dc.contributor.authorRoche-Seruendo, Luis Enrique-
dc.contributor.authorMolina-Molina, Alejandro-
dc.contributor.authorCardiel-Sanchez, Silvia-
dc.contributor.authorCarton-Llorente, Antonio-
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Pinillos, Felipe-
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-22T11:18:18Z-
dc.date.available2023-02-22T11:18:18Z-
dc.date.issued2022-06-26-
dc.identifier.citationJaén-Carrillo, D.; Roche-Seruendo, L.E.; Molina-Molina, A.; Cardiel-Sánchez, S.; Cartón-Llorente, A.; García-Pinillos, F. Influence of the Shod Condition on Running Power Output: An Analysis in Recreationally Active Endurance Runners. Sensors 2022, 22, 4828. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22134828en_US
dc.identifier.issn1424-8220en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.usj.es/handle/123456789/902-
dc.description.abstractSeveral studies have already analysed power output in running or the relation between VO2max and power production as factors related to running economy; however, there are no studies assessing the difference in power output between shod and barefoot running. This study aims to identify the effect of footwear on the power output endurance runner. Forty-one endurance runners (16 female) were evaluated at shod and barefoot running over a one-session running protocol at their preferred comfortable velocity (11.71 _ 1.07 km_h-1). The mean power output (MPO) and normalized MPO (MPOnorm), form power, vertical oscillation, leg stiffness, running effectiveness and spatiotemporal parameters were obtained using the Stryd™ foot pod system. Additionally, footstrike patterns were measured using high-speed video at 240 Hz. No differences were noted in MPO (p = 0.582) and MPOnorm (p = 0.568), whereas significant differences were found in form power, in both absolute (p = 0.001) and relative values (p < 0.001), running effectiveness (p = 0.006), stiffness (p = 0.002) and vertical oscillation (p < 0.001). By running barefoot, lower values for contact time (p < 0.001) and step length (p = 0.003) were obtained with greater step frequency (p < 0.001), compared to shod running. The prevalence of footstrike pattern significantly differs between conditions, with 19.5% of runners showing a rearfoot strike, whereas no runners showed a rearfoot strike during barefoot running. Running barefoot showed greater running effectiveness in comparison with shod running, and was consistent with lower values in form power and lower vertical oscillation. From a practical perspective, the long-term effect of barefoot running drills might lead to increased running efficiency and leg stiffness in endurance runners, affecting running economy.en_US
dc.format.extent9 p.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectBarefooten_US
dc.subjectFootstrikeen_US
dc.subjectSiffnessen_US
dc.subjectSensoren_US
dc.subjectWearableen_US
dc.titleInfluence of the Shod Condition on Running Power Output: An Analysis in Recreationally Active Endurance Runnersen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/s22134828en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
Aparece en las colecciones: Artículos de revistas

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
Influence of the Shod Condition on Running Power Output.pdf473,23 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir


Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons