Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repositorio.usj.es/handle/123456789/916

Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJaen-Carrillo, Diego-
dc.contributor.authorRuiz-Alias, Santiago-
dc.contributor.authorChicano-Gutierrez, Jose M-
dc.contributor.authorRuiz-Malagón, Emilio J.-
dc.contributor.authorRoche-Seruendo, Luis Enrique-
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Pinillos, Felipe-
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-29T12:22:40Z-
dc.date.available2023-05-29T12:22:40Z-
dc.date.issued2022-04-21-
dc.identifier.citationJaén-Carrillo, D.; Ruiz-Alias, S.A.; Chicano-Gutiérrez, J.M.; Ruiz-Malagón, E.J.; Roche-Seruendo, L.E.; García-Pinillos, F. Test-Retest Reliability of the MotionMetrix Software for the Analysis ofWalking and Running Gait Parameters. Sensors 2022, 22, 3201. https://doi.org/10.3390/ s22093201en_US
dc.identifier.issn1424-8220en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.usj.es/handle/123456789/916-
dc.description.abstractThe use of markerless motion capture systems is becoming more popular for walking and running analysis given their user-friendliness and their time efficiency but in some cases their validity is uncertain. Here, the test-retest reliability of the MotionMetrix software combined with the use of Kinect sensors is tested with 24 healthy volunteers for walking (at 5 km_h1) and running (at 10 and 15 km_h1) gait analysis in two different trials. All the parameters given by the MotionMetrix software for both walking and running gait analysis are tested in terms of reliability. No significant differences (p > 0.05) were found for walking gait parameters between both trials except for the phases of loading response and double support, and the spatiotemporal parameters of step length and step frequency. Additionally, all the parameters exhibit acceptable reliability (CV < 10%) but step width (CV > 10%). When analyzing running gait, although the parameters here tested exhibited different reliability values at 10 km_h1, the system provided reliable measurements for most of the kinematic and kinetic parameters (CV < 10%) when running at 15 km_h1. Overall, the results obtained show that, although some variables must be interpreted with caution, the Kinect + MotionMetrix system may be useful for walking and running gait analysis. Nevertheless, the validity still needs to be determined against a gold standard system to fully trust this technology and software combination.en_US
dc.format.extent10 p.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectAnalysisen_US
dc.subjectBiomechanicsen_US
dc.subjectGaiten_US
dc.subjectMarkerlessen_US
dc.subjectTestingen_US
dc.titleTest-Retest Reliability of the MotionMetrix Software for the Analysis of Walking and Running Gait Parametersen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/ s22093201en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
Appears in Collections:Artículos de revistas



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons