Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Title: Writing with conviction: the use of boosters in modelling persuasion in academic discourses
Authors: Vazquez-Orta, Ignacio ORCID SCOPUSID
Keywords: Discourse analysis; Academic discourse; Persuasion; Boosters; Research articles
Issue Date: 15-Nov-2009
Publisher: Universidad de Alicante
Citation: Vázquez Orta, I., & Giner, D. (2009). Writing with conviction: the use of boosters in modelling persuasion in academic discourses. Alicante Journal of English Studies / Revista Alicantina De Estudios Ingleses, (22), 219–237.
Abstract: Hedging and boosting are significant communicative resources to construe and attain persuasion in different fields and particular genres of academic writing. They are both two sides of the same coin in the sense that they both contribute to the persuasive import of academic communication. Although boosting is a much less researched phenomenon than hedging, it is a key aspect of rhetorical persuasion in academic writing. This paper is devoted to the analysis of the use of boosters in a corpus of articles from three different disciplines (Marketing, Biology and Mechanical Engineering), and in this sense it is complementary to our previous article (Vázquez and Giner, 2008) in which we explored the use of epistemic markers used as hedges in the same corpus of RAs. Based on computer readable data, and combining quantitative and qualitative methods, the article argues that boosting deserves particular attention if we want to fully interpret the phenomenon of academic persuasion.
ISSN: 2171-861X
Appears in Collections:Artículos de revistas

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Writing with conviction.pdf207,31 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons